Does mixing eBay and Facebook reduce bidding prices?

Apr. 9, 2013 ? In a competitive context, consumers are willing to pay significantly more to win when other bidders are unknown, according to a new study in the Journal of Consumer Research.

"The tendency to assume that other consumers are similar to us is reversed when we're in a competitive, as opposed to cooperative, situation. This alters our aggressiveness toward others and the prices we are willing to bid in auctions," write authors David A. Norton (University of Connecticut), Cait Lamberton (University of Pittsburgh), and Rebecca Walker Naylor (Ohio State University).

Consumers tend to believe strangers are socially similar. This lowers aggressiveness toward others. But competitive contexts lead consumers to become more aggressive because they infer that others are different.

In a series of simulated online auctions, some consumers viewed profiles of other bidders that were manipulated to be either similar or different (based on demographic information like age, gender, and location), while others weren't given any information about other bidders. Consumers consistently bid less aggressively when they believed their competitors were similar rather than different. More interestingly, bidding aggressiveness and prices were much higher when other bidders were different or unknown.

Companies using auctions may want to resist the urge to link consumers to social media profiles. Consumers who discover they share traits with the people they're competing against may lower their aggressiveness, pushing prices down.

"Competitive contexts radically change the assumptions we make about other consumers compared to cooperative situations. When we compete, we want to go for the jugular -- and we won't do that when we know we're competing against consumers who are similar to us. But we behave more aggressively when there is no other information about other consumers because we assume they are different," the authors conclude.

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:

---

Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by Journal of Consumer Research, Inc..

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.

---

Journal Reference:

1. David A. Norton, Cait Lamberton, and Rebecca Walker Naylor. The Devil You (Don?t) Know: Interpersonal Ambiguity and Inference Making in Competitive Contexts. Journal of Consumer Research, August 2013

Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/living_well/~3/-rR9ltKStMc/130409131210.htm

splunk dark shadows iau msft etan patz obama dog doug hutchison